Sunday, March 30, 2014

A Heart for God
1 Samuel 16:1-13

16 The Lord said to Samuel, “How long will you grieve over Saul? I have rejected him from being king over Israel. Fill your horn with oil and set out; I will send you to Jesse the Bethlehemite, for I have provided for myself a king among his sons.” Samuel said, “How can I go? If Saul hears of it, he will kill me.” And the Lord said, “Take a heifer with you, and say, ‘I have come to sacrifice to the Lord.’ Invite Jesse to the sacrifice, and I will show you what you shall do; and you shall anoint for me the one whom I name to you.” Samuel did what the Lord commanded, and came to Bethlehem. The elders of the city came to meet him trembling, and said, “Do you come peaceably?” He said, “Peaceably; I have come to sacrifice to the Lord; sanctify yourselves and come with me to the sacrifice.” And he sanctified Jesse and his sons and invited them to the sacrifice.
When they came, he looked on Eliab and thought, “Surely the Lord’s anointed is now before the Lord.” But the Lord said to Samuel, “Do not look on his appearance or on the height of his stature, because I have rejected him; for the Lord does not see as mortals see; they look on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.” Then Jesse called Abinadab, and made him pass before Samuel. He said, “Neither has the Lord chosen this one.” Then Jesse made Shammah pass by. And he said, “Neither has the Lord chosen this one.” 10 Jesse made seven of his sons pass before Samuel, and Samuel said to Jesse, “The Lord has not chosen any of these.” 11 Samuel said to Jesse, “Are all your sons here?” And he said, “There remains yet the youngest, but he is keeping the sheep.” And Samuel said to Jesse, “Send and bring him; for we will not sit down until he comes here.” 12 He sent and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and had beautiful eyes, and was handsome. The Lord said, “Rise and anoint him; for this is the one.” 13 Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the presence of his brothers; and the spirit of the Lord came mightily upon David from that day forward. Samuel then set out and went to Ramah.

The Word of the Lord
Thanks be to God

Let us begin today’s message by looking back at the history of Israel up to this point. During the years leading up to the life of Samuel the Israelites were ruled by a series of Judges of which Samuel was the last one. Unfortunately, over the course of about 300 years they began to stray further and further away from God. Their priestly leaders, who were charged with the spiritual welfare of the people, were essentially becoming obsolete. The people stopped coming to be cleansed and refused to turn from idols. The priests were still in good standing with God; it’s just that the people no longer sought God so the priests were no longer an effective means of mediation.[1] So Samuel’s role became one of prophet, the voice of God to the people, instead of a judge. The first seven chapters of 1 Samuel tell the story of Israel’s plunge into disarray. It is at one of the lowest points of the nation’s history that the people begin to request a King, like the other nations around them. Up to the point they were led by God through leaders like Moses and then governed by the judges, but God was their “King.” They had already turned from God, but this was a self-serving request by the people. Basically, they believed one of them could do a better job of leading the nation than God himself. Samuel was not too happy about this request. In chapter 8 we read, “Then all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah, and said to him, “You are old and your sons do not follow in your ways; appoint for us, then, a king to govern us, like other nations.” But the thing displeased Samuel when they said, “Give us a king to govern us.” Samuel prayed to the Lord, and the Lord said to Samuel, “Listen to the voice of the people in all that they say to you; for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected me from being king over them. Just as they have done to me, from the day I brought them up out of Egypt to this day, forsaking me and serving other gods, so also they are doing to you. Now then, listen to their voice; only—you shall solemnly warn them, and show them the ways of the king who shall reign over them.” So Samuel warns them that a King ruling over them is not what they want but they insist anyway. Aren’t we like that sometimes? We insist on getting our way with God. We might pray over and over for something we want, and we might even try to convince ourselves that it is what God wants, but ultimately, it is our will we are seeking, not God’s. The Bible tells us that God grants Israel’s request and Saul is chosen as their leader. The next few chapters tell us about the reign of Saul. There are examples of times when God instructs Saul on what to do and he does it. Then there are times when Saul alters God’s plan in order to accomplish something for himself. The final straw, if you will, is when Saul refuses to completely wipe out the Amalekites, a nation that has gone against God’s people ever since they came out of Egypt. From that point on God rejects Saul as Israel’s king. However, Saul is not immediately removed from power. That is what makes Samuel’s next task so daunting. This is where out passage for this morning picks up.

We read that Samuel is instructed to anoint the next king of Israel. Notice how the chapter begins. God is asking how long Samuel plans to grieve over Saul. Remember Saul isn’t dead yet, Samuel just knows that God is no longer with him. I imagine his grieving is probably both for Saul and also for the people of Israel. So now God wants him to go and choose the next king before the current one is dethroned. Now some of you are sports fans I know so perhaps you have heard the term that has become popular over the last few years known as “Head Coach in Waiting.” This has been used as a way to hire a top notch assistant by promising the head job to him when the current coach retires. This is generally used when the current coach is nearing retirement but that date has not been set. In spite of all intentions to the contrary, there has to be a sense of tension as one guy waits for his turn and the other guy is holding on, maybe too long, to his. That tension certainly exists between Saul and David later on so Samuel’s reluctance to be a part of this is understandable. Nevertheless, Samuel after protesting for fear of his own life, agrees to go to Bethlehem to anoint this son of Jesse as the Lord requests. Even the elders of the town fear that something is wrong when they see Samuel coming. Verse 4 states “…The elders of the city came to meet him trembling and said, ‘Do you come peaceably?’” When Samuel states that he is there to sacrifice with Jesse and his sons there must have been an audible sigh of relief.

Verse 6 begins the process that Samuel was sent to do in the first place. It is also at the heart of today’s message. “When they came, he looked on Eliab and thought, “Surely the Lord’s anointed is now before the Lord.” When they came in, so at this point no one has spoken, no interviews have been given, no references checked, just a first impression and already Samuel has concluded that surely this is the man I am to appoint. How must he have looked? He was tall, handsome, physically fit, perhaps facial features that reflected some amount of wisdom. After all, he was the first of seven sons about to pass before Samuel so he surely had a few years on him and was by all accounts a perfect specimen for a king. Yet verse 7 goes on to tell us what Samuel is missing. But the Lord said to Samuel, “Do not look on his appearance or on the height of his stature, because I have rejected him; for the Lord does not see as mortals see; they look on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.” Not only is Samuel surprised that this isn’t the one, I would imagine that all those gathered were shocked. Have no fear; however, Jesse has more sons to present before Samuel. As each one approached and each one was rejected there must have been questions swirling around everyone’s head. When finally the last one in attendance gets rejected Samuel questions Jesse.  “Are all you sons here?” I don’t believe that Samuel knew there was one missing from the feast; I just think he knows God sent him to anoint a king, a son of Jesse, and God certainly would not have sent him only to reject each one. So Jesse tells him there is one more but he is keeping the sheep. How should we look at that? Someone had to keep watch over the sheep so the responsibility falls to the youngest. If the purpose of this gathering was to anoint a new king then surely this young boy wouldn’t be the one anyway so just let him stay out with the sheep. Now if this isn’t my younger brother’s favorite Bible story then I don’t know what would be. Here we have the oldest son being presented as the logical choice to be the next king only to be rejected. And the youngest son, almost as an afterthought, left in the fields while the rest of the family enjoys a feast and sacrifice actually being the chosen one. Samuel tells Jesse to send for him and that “…we will not sit down before he comes here.” When he does arrive and is brought in the Lord said, “‘Rise and anoint him; for this is the one’13 Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the presence of his brothers; and the spirit of the Lord came mightily upon David from that day forward.” One thing about verse 12 intrigues me. David is described as ruddy and had beautiful eyes and was handsome. A description like that almost goes against what I was thinking. When we hear someone say God looks on the inside, we assume that means the outside must be something not worth looking at. This description, however, does not show that. Upon further review, it does make sense to me though. Handsome wasn’t what God was looking for. If it was then Eliab would have fit the bill and this process wouldn’t have taken so long. It only proves that it was David’s heart that God saw and was pleased.

So God looks on the heart. The question posed by the title of the sermon is, “Do we have a heart for God?” What exactly does that mean? Let’s start with this example. I was watching Big Bang Theory the other night. If you are not familiar with that show it is a very funny, though perhaps not a church appropriate, show. One of the characters, Sheldon, has a mother who is a Bible believing Texan and is not afraid to express that in the company of others. Anyway, Sheldon’s roommate, Leonard, had just given poor advice to a friend about how to treat a girl who he had recently been in a relationship with. Leonard’s goal was to appear to be giving good dating advice to a friend when all the time he was actually giving what he thought was bad advice so the date would fail and he would get another shot at dating the girl himself. When he verbalizes his regret over his actions Sheldon in classic form states, “For what it's worth, my mother says that when we deceive for personal gain, we make Jesus cry.” It probably isn’t too much of a stretch for any of us to think back to a time when we intentionally gave bad advice. What makes it difficult for us mortals is that we can’t see the heart like God can. Sometimes our outward actions look the same but the inner intent might be totally opposite. For example, let’s say you have a friend who asks you opinion on a new dress. You answer the dress looks great. Now, let’s suppose that you really don’t think the dress looks good, but that is how you answer. On the one hand she is your friend and she just spent a lot of money on this dress, she’s real excited about it and you don’t want to hurt her feelings so you tell a little white lie and say the dress looks good. Perhaps that is a noble thing to do. It’s just your opinion anyway. Maybe others will think it looks good. You are looking out for your friend’s feelings. On the other hand, let’s say you know the dress looks bad but you know if you say it looks good she will wear it out that night and look ridiculous making you look better. On the surface the comment is the same, but underneath the outward expression is an inner motive that might escape your friend, but not God.

We have to be careful when we make preconceived judgments on outward appearance. Have you done that lately? Any thoughts like these ever creep into your mind?

  •     She’s beautiful so she can’t be that smart. She just gets her way because she looks good.
  •     He’s black, white, Hispanic, Asian, etc…so he can’t be smart, must not be able to run fast or jump high, is taking American jobs, can’t speak good English so must be illegally here. You fill in any derogatory comment you want in here.
  •     He is Muslim, Jewish, Hindu or even Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, etc. so…


Make no mistake; we all make judgments on first impressions. You know the expression, “You don’t get a second chance to make a first impression.” That whole first impression thing works both ways. Sometimes our initial evaluation of someone is very positive only to find out later that inside the person is really a mean person. Other times we get a bad feeling about someone only to find out later (after we take the time to get to know them) that they really do have a good heart. Regardless, what is usually the first impression; the physical appearance. That is why we wear our best suits to interviews. When we walk in the door the evaluation has already begun. It is natural human instinct to look on the outside first. After all it is literally the first thing we see. That is why Samuel thought he had the next king when the first son came in. But God sees all. The challenge for us is two-fold. We have to be careful not to look at others and base our impression of them solely on that of appearance. Take the time to get to know that new co-worker or neighbor. Perhaps you will find that they have a heart of gold. But not only that and maybe more importantly, we need to make sure that when others see us, they see a reflection of Christ in us. The only way that happens is for us to seek God from the inside out. We need to develop our heart for God. If we do then the rest will take care of itself.

Let us pray.



[1] Steadman

Friday, February 7, 2014

Super Bowl

Time to update my link on I’m Just Sayin…

The Super Bowl is over and a lot has been said about individual players more so than each of the teams. Peyton Manning and Richard Sherman, for instance, have gotten a lot of the press lately. For the record, I like both of these players. I was watching the interview after the NFC Championship game when Sherman went off on Michael Crabtree live as it happened. My initial response was that is completely unnecessary. Incidentally, Sherman after the fact, agreed. However, when you stick a microphone in the face of an intense player after a game clinching (and Super Bowl berth) play, what happened should not have been surprising. We ask these players to play with a ferocious intensity between the lines, and then ask them to turn it off when the game is over. That is exactly what Sherman does. Anyone who can graduate from Stanford (in three years, I believe) ain’t no dope. His demeanor off the field is very professional. Those who took to Twitter and other Social Media to criticize him in a brutal fashion only show their own ignorance, that same ignorance that they accuse Sherman of having. It is not unlike sticking a microphone in the face of a Tony Stewart or other emotional driver right after someone put them into the wall at 200 MPH.  “How do feel about almost losing your life?” Are we really surprised when those drivers start dropping the F-Bomb? Well you shouldn’t be. What happened with Sherman is EXACTLY what FOX, NBC, CBS, ESPN, etc. all want to happen. When you wait to interview players and coaches in the pressroom after they have had a moment to decompress, it takes some more prodding by headline seeking reporters to get most of them to spout off at the competition or maybe the refs. Get them in the heat of the moment and somebody better have their hand on the 8-second delay dump button. Ratings, whatever it takes.

Now let’s talk about Peyton. When you try to decide who is the greatest _______ of all time, you have to take into account many, many factors. There are very few athletes in any sport who can without debate, be considered the greatest of all time. Michael Jordan as the greatest NBA star of all time is about as close as you can get. Maybe another day we will debate those other sports, but right now I want to focus on football. I heard the analogy of the greatest quarterbacks sitting at the table and trying to decide who should be at the head of the table. If you don’t think that Manning deserves to be at that table and at least in the discussion, you can stop reading now because logic doesn’t apply to you. Championship rings do matter. But they are not the only criteria to being a great quarterback. Dan Marino is widely considered one of the greatest QB’s of all time; in fact he is often considered the greatest without a championship. That was Manning’s tag until he won a Super Bowl. Now it’s, one isn’t enough. I contend that Manning, like Marino before him, and Tom Brady now, make their teams achieve more than they would have otherwise. Miami hasn’t done squat since Marino retired. They can’t find the next Marino. Manning not only set the season record for TD’s this year, but he did it by having 5 different players catch 10 or more TD passes. Tom Brady wins with guys we’ve never heard of. I still try and go by what I heard Joe Morgan say one time about trying to say who was the greatest of all time. You really can’t compare players from different eras. What you can do though is compare their numbers to those who they played with and against. By that standard, what Marino accomplished statistically, if not with championships, puts him in the conversation. He put up numbers in a time when defense ruled the game, all but his Miami defenses. Hence, no Super Bowl victories. And Peyton, only Tom Brady is really in the same category as him. Drew Brees, Ben Roethlisberger, Eli Manning, Aaron Rogers are all great QB’s and you could make an argument for them, but what Peyton has done at this point of his career puts him right at the top if not on top. Greatest of all time? Maybe, maybe not. But the abuse he is taking for his playoff record and Super Bowl record is to me, a little ridiculous.

So rock on Richard Sherman and Peyton Manning. Both of you, and your teams, had great seasons.

By the way, my wife loves Peyton Manning. I think if he were to walk into the room…wait a minute that gives me an idea. Does anyone have a Peyton Manning jersey I can borrow?

Monday, January 13, 2014

MLB Hall of Fame

If you are a fan of baseball then by now you should be aware that Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, and Frank Thomas have all been elected to the MLB Hall of Fame. There is no real argument from anyone that those three deserve to be enshrined. The system they use to determine who gets in and who doesn’t is really a simple process. A number of reporters who are a part of the Baseball Writers Association of America are sent ballots and they vote on eligible retired players. If 75% of the people feel like they are Hall of Fame worthy, then they get in. If less than 75% feel that way then they do not. That sounds simple enough. The problem is in all the other rules. Deciding who gets to vote is another issue that I may take up later but for now I want to focus on the process. First of all a player has to have 10 or more years of experience and been retired for 5 years. At that time they come on the ballot. Each voter can only vote for 10 players in any one year. I don’t think there has ever been a year where 10 players retired at the same time and were are all HOF worthy. The problem is if the player doesn’t make the 75% cutoff, then they stay on the ballot for 15 years or until they drop below 5% of the total vote. Therefore, the ballot can get crammed. This has especially been an issue as more and more “steroid era” players are coming up for election. Why? Because some voters don’t think anyone in the steroid era should be eligible or at a minimum feel like anyone accused should be kept out. Since there are others who vote on them regardless, there are many who would otherwise be in that are hovering in that 5% - 75% range. That means as more of these HOF worthy players come up for election it makes it harder to vote for only 10. The most shameful part about this year’s voting involves Craig Biggio. He missed the 75% cutoff by 2 votes. He deserves to be in. I say that’s the most shameful thing but perhaps it is that Greg Maddux was actually left off of some peoples ballots. Are you kidding me? I will attempt to address these two issues in later posts. For now I’ll just leave you with this little nugget. I have watched all three of these inductees play in person. I saw Maddux and Glavine multiple times while they were with the Braves and Thomas when he was at Auburn and they came to Clemson to play while I was a student there. Yes, he was big and strong then too. 

Monday, January 6, 2014

New Year

With the new year upon us it is time for some new posts. I don't know what direction 2014 will take me but I will attempt to post on a more regular basis. Perhaps we can team up with I'm Just Sayin...again this year and give you a "Best of" series similar to last year's Greatest of All Time baseball list. We'll see...for now though I just wanted the link on his site to show a post more recent than "1 month ago."